The only poster on Amazon…

…that has the Books of the Bible.

My company is selling it. All the other posters you can find that are marketed as “Books of the Bible” are Protestant canons – so they are missing some books.

Click HERE

Buy a copy for yourself, your parish, your school, your friend…

I’ve been silent on these pages lately – I needed a break. It might be time to come back to more regular posting.

A post a day…

Keeps the lazy away.

But is it worth it? I have missed only a few days since starting the blitz – including yesterday (whoops) – and while it does stretch me, it might be stretching me a bit too thin… What else makes me reconsider is that the content is a bit thinner too.

Constancy is a virtue. But so is prudence.

Unless this post gets 15 likes – the most I’ve ever had – by this time tomorrow, I am going to return to a milder pace… Once or maybe twice a week, rather than once a day. I’d prefer to put out really meaningful content than really frequent content. But you tell me.

In defense of nice digs…

A strange post, but one which might be helpful.

Read the piece at OSV which I am responding to here. The author, whose writing has certainly been helpful over the years in various ways, seems to have some gripe with bishops, and especially cardinals, having suitable housing.

I realize I just begged the question.

Most people who criticize the “opulence” of cardinals’ apartments in Rome have never been inside one (I have – including one of the apartments mentioned), nor are they aware of the history which led to the current arrangements (I am, at least more than most). If you are not aware, there is a “cardinals’ neighborhood” just to the east of St. Peter’s Square. The entire area was built up by Pius XI about a hundred years ago, for offices and, yes, for apartments. If you are a cardinal residing in Rome, this is typically where you live, unless there is some special circumstance which would require you to live somewhere else, such as being archpriest of one of the papal basilicas.

The apartments are large enough for an office, a bedroom, a kitchen, a chapel, and a spacious sitting room, sometimes another few rooms, and they are often decorated in keeping with their function – to offer to other prelates, and to any number of distinguished persons, including diplomats or even heads of state, a fitting place of reception. Cardinals receive all kinds of gifts which might furnish their quarters and remind them of their gracious benefactors.

As for paying rent and receiving salaries/stipends (not brought up but is connected) – well, imagine you are a globally visible prelate who has had a career as a bishop in another country or some other place in Italy over the span of decades, and you are sought after as a speaker in far away places – you will be constantly on the move, paying for your travel costs. People ask you for funding for their pious pet projects, some of them very large projects – all the time. You are responsible for hosting this group, that dignitary, and some other prelate, all in the same week. You have your own personal expenses – food, medicine, clothing (very particular and expensive clothing), liturgical implements, various (sometimes rare) books, and other odds and ends. Maybe you are even paying some assistant out of your own pocket as well. (I believe the full-time secretaries are compensated in some other way – though I’m not sure about that.) Should we add rent to this too, now?

Soon enough, that 4,000 Euro/month stipend (or thereabouts) doesn’t exactly seem “luxurious.” In fact, it is kind of measly. No, it’s not life in the slums, but it is not Richie Rich either.

Cardinals and other prelates ought to have quarters which befit their office and which honor the guests which they host, as noted above. We shouldn’t begrudge them for that.

Also, security concerns, for both residents and guests. Hello.

As for Francis’s living quarters, his own word on that matter was that his preference for the Casa S. Martha was on account of proximity to larger numbers of people – not because it is “simpler” – he rejected that, and he noted that the papal apartment (in the palace) is actually not that lavish at all, just tastefully decorated. So… so much for that.

As for the poor around the colonnade – they are of various types, and anyone who spends real time around the piazza (or in Rome) knows that the lion’s share of the Roman homeless and beggars are either mentally ill, addicts of some sort, a combination of those two, or are “professional beggars” of some kind. There are some exceptions – I have personally known one such case, who actively sought work and finally found it – but it is just farcical to argue that since some poor guy with schizophrenia and a serious alcohol problem sleeps in the tunnel by the parking garage near St. Peter’s, Cardinal So-and-So should live in some random residential quarter of Rome in an unremarkable apartment surrounded by who knows what sort of people accountable to who knows what kind of landlord. (And there are some CRAZY ones here – just think what Signora X, the Cardinal’s new landlord and upstairs neighbor, a young divorcee and a lover of night-life, would put His Eminence through, and for what? So some bloggers feel better about things? Give me a break.)

I don’t know how much any given cardinal knows about various housing crises around the world. But that is a little irrelevant to the fact that being a cardinal in Rome usually means you need an apartment, preferably almost on top of the Vatican. Luckily – there is a whole neighborhood designated for that function, where only cardinals and their staff live. It’s almost like Pius XI thought this through.

As for normal bishops, if they like living in their own house, great. If they have a very dignified house, preferably near the cathedral, great. If they want to live in a normal rectory with other priests, great. But many of the arguments above apply similarly. Yes, there can be abuses – as has been seen in past years, here and there (i.e. the “Bishop of Bling” incident)… But that is not the norm. So let’s stop the finger-wagging, shall we? Especially when such apartments are, in fact, standard-issue, and such houses are often part of the history and legacy of the diocese.

I want my bishops to live well so they are not hindered by temporal needs. It should be the last thing they need to worry about. And supplying prelates with nice temporalities is a way to thank them for their work and to remind them of the dignity of their office – and it is a way to honor Him who entrusted them with that office in the first place.

Some thoughts on “Fiducia Supplicans”

We could have done without it.

There are a few questions I have – “doubts,” one might say…

  1. What exactly was the need for addressing this issue in the first place, as opposed to any number of issues which seem much more pressing and much more serious to the vast majority of informed observers, especially given the very recent (and largely opposite) treatment by the DDF?
  2. Is it Roman opinion that there were clergy “on the fence” about this practice who will now fundamentally change how they minister?
  3. Did not occur to the DDF that, in fact, all kinds of “irregular couples” have been blessed for ages – even “liturgically” in the strictest sense – ever since such people have showed up at Mass and stayed to the end, when everyone present gets a blessing?
  4. Why is it presumed to be appropriate or advantageous to give “one” blessing to two people whose “couplehood” in and of itself clearly presents seriously problematic moral data, rather than two individual blessings to the two individuals of the “couple” (or however many members of a polyamorous relationship)? (This is the most important question.) Is it because some priests have very tired arms and can only muster one motion of the hand? Or are drive-by blessings a thing in some places? Yes, no? What is it?
  5. If the confusion and blowback were foreseen, what is the need for all the explanation, especially since the document said not to expect clarification? If the confusion and blowback were not foreseen, why? What is the plan to keep this from happening again? Is there one?
  6. If “irregular couples” can be blessed “non-liturgically” or “pastorally,” does this extend to other groups or associations which of themselves or in their proper context are morally problematic, such as terrorist camps, conventions of abortionists, and other such entities, especially given that these seem to need grace even more than “irregular couples”? If not, why not? Is it merely a prudential consideration, or is it something intrinsic to the act itself?
  7. Why was it not recommended instead merely to pray for “irregular couples,” rather than to “bless” them, especially given that much of the world is unable to distinguish “blessing a couple” from “blessing a union” or even from “witnessing a marriage”?

So, those are some questions. The argument that some have made about cohabiting heterosexual couples receiving blessings (i.e. in the context of a marriage preparation session) fails; the reason is that such a relationship does not present a problem in and of itself the way that adulterous, homosexual, or polygamous relationships do. There is a legitimate “telos” or “end” of the relationship as such with a single man and a single woman. Not so with the “irregular.”

I really do think that ignorance is a better explanation than malice. I also think that Fiducia Supplicans, for all its issues, has called attention to a serious problem which has until now not been so evident – we have a very weak understanding all around of what exactly “blessings” are and how they work. I hope to do a follow-up post in some weeks to go through some points which could be helpful (i.e. the distinction between invocative blessings and constitutive blessings).

We need to pray. Don’t get angry, get pious.

Catholic Meme Friday – DDF shenanigans

We should make fun of what is ridiculous, with due respect for people and their office.

The DDF is an absolute clown car right now, putting out seriously harmful nonsense.

I remind you the WORST thing, which went relatively unnoticed, was the Prefect strongly implying a few weeks ago in that document on cremation that Catholics can believe in reincarnation…

I’ll release my own thoughts on “Fiducia Supplicans” in a few more days. It’s good to take time to think before reacting.

Towards Constantinople…

…then to Rome.

In honor all that is good in the legacy of Constantinople (now Istanbul), read Universalis’s description of the saint who penned today’s second reading from the Office of Readings, St. Maximus the Confessor. (Then maybe give the reading itself a shot.)

And, since I am still in America, it is most appropriate to celebrate the first American saint, Elizabeth Ann Seton, so close to my own heart because of her foundation in Emmitsburg, where my alma mater Mount St. Mary’s University is, the legacy of which is intertwined with her own. It is her feast today. Check out her story!

A domani…
-Eamonn

The relevance of Africa

Most of my readership is American, and a small chunk is from Europe. A smattering of readers in Asia from time to time.

So let me tell you that what matters right now in the Church is Africa.

Everyone is seeing the African response to a certain DDF text. Okay. The energy and orthodoxy, by and large, is south of the Sahara these days.

There are certainly problems with some of the way things are done “down there.” Many men enter seminary for the wrong reasons. There are some odd ideas about chastity. There is a certain kind of chaos.

But that is where the Finger of God has come down in this age. Recall that the center of Christendom used to be in what is now Algeria, Tunisia, and Egypt… It has taken some 1600 years for that energy to move across the desert, after a European vacation.

I joke with my many African priest friends sometimes – “Africa is a big country.” They know I am joking but rush to correct me… “AFRICA IS A CONTINENT!” How many times they’ve heard an American or other Westerner something like, “Oh, you’re from Africa? Do you know Fr. XYZ? He’s from Africa too!”

In some places, a diocese will have several hundred seminarians. The bishops have so many men they hardly know what to do with them. And so plenty find their way to a parish near you. And you get their preaching, teaching, confessing, management, leadership. And that will be more and more frequently the case. So why are you not more interested in African Catholicism?

There ARE ways to find out about Catholic Africa without actually going there. But they are either very “formal,” like CNA Africa, or they are so local as to be totally uninteresting to a wide audience unless there is some particular crisis or major event – like the sudden rush of interest in certain bishops and dioceses after Fiducia Supplicans, for example.

There needs to be a news service that is both local and detailed enough to be interesting and informed while still being broad enough to be of interest to all of Africa and beyond. It needs to be run differently than the traditional cable-style news channels, with their bulky and slow-moving systems. We need something more agile and in-depth, something more creative… Something which informs on current events but also goes deeper, something which will give non-Africans a perspective on what exactly is going on in that “big country” so that we are all a little less ignorant.

So that’s another project for 2024.

If investing in or otherwise working on an African Catholic news service interests you, get in touch with me. I have already begun the initial conversation, and I hope things will move forward significantly in the summer or fall. More details to follow.

Pius XI and his chasuble

Today is the Feast of Ss. Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzen. I posted once a great speech of Gregory – his farewell address at First Constantinople, after he abdicated from the patriarchal throne after a few weeks’ time… First Constantinople was one of the craziest ecumenical councils we’ve ever had (while Chalcedon is probably the craziest, the most dramatic, and even the most important). You can also read some of Gregory’s letters to Basil here

Today, a different act of filial piety – I found some footage of Pius XI which I had never seen before. That’s unusual. I recently held some photographs in my hands that have not been published, and I am also now in possession of a copy of his handwritten notes on the (in)famous paragraphs in Quadragesimo Anno which almost provoked a civil war. I also discovered his seemingly unpublished diaries about his time as nuncio in Poland.

Speaking of Poland…

I return to Rome in a few days. Next week I begin work in the Jesuit archives, looking at things going on there during Pius XI’s papacy… He was very close to the Superior General (Polish!), whose family was enormously impressive – more on that later.

Saints Basil and Gregory, pray for us!